Modern Web Writing Guide
This repository is a practical playbook for modern web writing.
It is intentionally focused on writing craft, not fiction craft and not standalone audience-growth strategy.
Scope
This guide covers:
- Ideation and outlining
- Clear, high-velocity drafting
- Editing for clarity and usefulness
- Format-specific rules for common web mediums
- Style-specific rules that can be mixed responsibly
- Reusable references for cross-cutting concepts
This guide does not cover:
- Novel or long-form fiction techniques
- Platform growth tactics that are not directly tied to writing quality
- Tool-specific lint setup instructions
Rule Block Format
Every guidance rule should use this structure:
- Advice title (rule)
- Description and explanation
- Negative example
- Positive example
Directory Map
general/: universal writing advice across formatsformats/: medium-specific playbookscontent-intent/: purpose-specific playbooks (what the piece is trying to achieve)styles/: voice and style playbooksreferences/: reusable concept docs used by multiple documents
Start Here
- Read
general/core-web-writing-rules.md - Read
general/idea-generation-systems.md - Pick your target medium in
formats/ - Pick your content purpose in
content-intent/ - Pick your primary voice in
styles/ - Use shared standards in
references/
Format vs Content-Intent vs Style
- Format: where the piece publishes and how it is packaged (for example newsletter, article, x-thread)
- Content-intent: what the piece is trying to achieve (for example tutorial, case-study, opinion-piece)
- Style: how the piece sounds (for example analytical, friendly, persuasive)
Example: article format + deep-dive-analysis content-intent + analytical style.
Required Formats
- article
- blog-post
- newsletter
- x-post
- x-thread
- reddit-post
- linkedin-post
- landing-page-copy
- press-release
- science-paper
Required Styles
- professional
- friendly
- technical
- academic
- storytelling
- persuasive
- conversational
- authoritative
- analytical
- playful
- empathetic
- journalistic
- minimalist
Content Intent (V1)
- tutorial
- how-to-guide
- opinion-piece
- interview-q-and-a
- case-study
- roundup-curation
- announcement
- personal-essay
- critique-review
- deep-dive-analysis
- listicle
- counterargument
- cornerstone
Quality Baselines
- Default readability target: Flesch Reading Ease above 70 for web-first writing
- Dense technical and strict academic contexts may run 60-70 when precision requires it
- Science paper guidance prioritizes precision, while still encouraging readability improvements
- Prose rules should align with plain-language checks and consistency checks defined in
references/prose-quality-checks.md
Authoring Policy
- Keep guidance practical, testable, and example-driven
- Prefer clear over clever
- Keep examples realistic for web publishing contexts
- Avoid direct tool-brand language in guide text
Prompt-Safe Policy
This guide is used in prompt contexts for content generation. Write guidance so each excerpt is directly usable by an LLM drafting content.
Include:
- generation-time rules (structure, clarity, specificity, evidence, tone, sequencing)
- concrete negative and positive examples
- constraints that can be applied inside a single draft
Avoid:
- workflow or operations advice (publishing cadence, post-publish analytics, feedback loops)
- instructions to create multiple variants before choosing
- platform growth tactics not directly tied to writing quality
Migration Notes
The prompt-era rules that are most important for generation parity are now documented in:
references/target-length-guidance.mdreferences/multi-channel-brief-strategy.mdreferences/image-planning-strategy.mdstyles/storytelling.mdformats/landing-page-copy.md