Style Mixing Guidance
Safe Mixes
- technical + empathetic: complex instruction with human support
- professional + persuasive: recommendation with clear business rationale
- analytical + authoritative: evidence-heavy argument with decisive framing
- friendly + minimalist: warm tone with concise delivery
- journalistic + analytical: reported facts plus explicit tradeoff reading
Risky Mixes
- playful + academic in strict formal contexts
- authoritative + conversational when nuance is required
- minimalist + persuasive when evidence detail is essential
Rule: Declare the Base Voice First
Description: The opening paragraph should establish the primary style. Negative example: Opening starts playful, switches to formal legal tone without transition. Positive example: Opening establishes professional tone, then uses one friendly clarifier.
Rule: Resolve Style Conflicts Explicitly
Description: If two styles conflict, prioritize context requirements. Negative example: Casual contractions in strict journal-style science sections. Positive example: Formal science body with concise plain-language summaries where allowed.
Rule: Keep One Consistency Layer
Description: Preserve consistent terminology and structure even when tone shifts. Negative example: Terms renamed every section due to voice changes. Positive example: Same key terms across all sections, with style changes in sentence rhythm only.