Target Length Guidance
Use this reference to choose scope before drafting.
Length is not a vanity metric. Length should match decision complexity, reader awareness, and proof needs.
Tier Definitions
Small
Use when the reader needs one practical answer fast.
- Article: 300-800 words, 2-4 sections, about 2-3 body paragraphs per section.
- Blog post: 500-900 words.
- X thread: 3-5 posts.
- X post: 70-150 characters.
- Reddit post: 150-400 words.
- LinkedIn post: 50-150 words.
- Newsletter: 300-800 words, 1-2 sections.
- Landing-page copy: 150-400 words.
Medium
Use as the default for most publishing contexts.
- Article: 800-1,800 words, 4-6 sections, about 3-5 body paragraphs per section.
- Blog post: 900-1,800 words.
- X thread: 5-8 posts.
- X post: 150-280 characters or 2-4 short lines.
- Reddit post: 400-1,200 words.
- LinkedIn post: 150-400 words.
- Newsletter: 800-1,800 words, 2-4 sections.
- Landing-page copy: 400-900 words.
Large
Use for high-value topics that require depth, objections, edge cases, and synthesis.
- Article: 1,800-3,500+ words, 6-10 sections, about 5-8 body paragraphs per section.
- Blog post: 1,800-3,000 words.
- X thread: 8-12 posts.
- X post: 200-300 characters.
- Reddit post: 1,200-2,500+ words.
- LinkedIn post: 400-900 words.
- Newsletter: 1,800-3,000 words.
- Landing-page copy: 900-2,000+ words.
Rules
Rule: Choose Tier by Decision Load
Description: Pick size based on how much proof and objection handling the reader needs before action. Negative example: Writing a large-form explainer for a simple one-step tip. Positive example: Using a small format for one tactical fix and reserving large format for strategic decisions.
Rule: Keep Structure Proportional to Length
Description: As length increases, section count and evidence density should increase with it. Negative example: A 2,000-word article with only two broad sections and repetitive conclusions. Positive example: A 2,000-word article with 6-8 distinct sections, each anchored to one claim and supporting proof.
Rule: Let Utility Control Final Length
Description: Keep lines that increase clarity, proof quality, or decision confidence. Cut lines that only restate. Negative example: Padding the draft to hit a round number. Positive example: Trimming duplicate transitions while preserving mechanisms, examples, and counterarguments.